|
|
|
|
|
|
by mort96
1172 days ago
|
|
|
Aha, I think I see. Upon reflection, I do remember that some people seem to think that UB is a property of the code, not the execution; that a piece of code either "contains UB" or does not. I suppose it makes sense then that some people may think that code which works under constexpr can't "contain UB" and get the wrong idea. |
|
|