[prakhar897]

Sorry for being rude.

The above article sounds like written by GPT. Also, the author's tweets look like this:

"If you really wanna learn about somebody, skip the 60 minute interview and have them drive you through New York City for 15 minutes."

And then this person calls himself "The Writing Guy" on his twitter bio and unironically sells a writing course.

[zmxz]

Could you explain how's that related to 51 ideas that are listed on the link?

I'm struggling to see the connection you are seeing, can you clarify? Are the ideas mentioned worth less because you found a potential way to discredit the person listing them?

[pcthrowaway]

Opportunity cost. We'd do better to discuss something that wasn't GPT vomit. Especially this GPT vomit, which is not very good

[zmxz]

So what you're saying is that what you wrote is correct and you should be trusted because... of what?

Given your nickname and attitude, how does one not conclude you're here to just be negative because you can?

[crhulls]

The ideas are simple and not particularly unique, but sometimes a list of simple but not unique ideas, which many of us already know, but nicely articulated in one place, can spark thought.

If I took at as a deep philosophical treatise I might agree with you, but that isn’t what it is and I don’t think that makes it vomit.

[pcthrowaway]

These aren't even nicely articulated, they're poorly articulated and full of inaccuracies

[zmxz]

To quote Luke Skywalker: everything you said is wrong

[punnerud]

ChatGPT/OpenAIs detector does not agree: “The classifier considers the text to be very unlikely AI-generated.”

I pasted first half of the article into it.

https://platform.openai.com/ai-text-classifier

[suddenclarity]

That's the tool that only can correctly classify 26% of AI written text?

[prakhar897]

Here's one written by ChatGPT. https://sharegpt.com/c/cjnFahj

2 in the top 5 matches the handwritten article.