Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by iamsaitam 1164 days ago
Even though you go on explaining what you mean by "open", seeing that the common definition is "open (source)", I'd go for a different qualifier.
2 comments
3np 1164 days ago
It's available under MIT License hosted on GitHub. Am I missing something?

https://github.com/brillout/vite-plugin-ssr/blob/main/LICENS...

link
brillout 1164 days ago
I think parent means that both Next.js and vite-plugin-ssr are open source, so "open(-source)" isn't a differentiator.

I agree although we think we can keep the word "open" and make it clear that we're takling about being a "open framework" (and not only open source).

link
brillout 1164 days ago
Yea, we've plans to improve communicating that. (Although we do plan to stick to the word "open".)
link