|
|
|
|
|
by dnc
1165 days ago
|
|
According to the article (and the discussed research) this was only a minor factor: "The researchers also explored the possibility that index changes are more predictable today than in the past, leading sophisticated market participants to trade ahead of the events. They concluded that this played only a minor role in their findings, however." The two main factors being: "...an increase in migrations over time from the S&P MidCap 400 index, and an overall increase in the market's ability to provide liquidity to those investors seeking to buy and sell around the time of index changes. The additional liquidity has 'made it easier for everyone to trade, and as a result, the prices move less.' says Dr. Greenwood. And with more stocks migrating to the S&P 500 from the S&P MidCap 400, midcap funds are selling as S&P 500 funds are buying, leading to 'a wash' in demand, he says. " |
|
Note that this isn't perfect - index fund A has more assets under management than index fund B, etc. But as index investing grows, the actual investor inflows and outflows are what dominate, not rebalancing moves.