|
|
|
|
|
by mdp2021
1168 days ago
|
|
No prob on this side C., I just took the occasion of your input for substantiveness. (I would suggest that you mark sarcasm, e.g. with '/S' or equivalent. Once upon a time we all thought that rhetoric is immediately recognizable, then we met people who would believe ideas beyond the boundary of "anything".) |
|