|
|
|
|
|
by mamcx
1167 days ago
|
|
Also, most of the "action" on this sphere is for the "super-rich" customer: Assume it has more than 1 machine, lots of RAM, fast i/o & fast networks, etc. And this means: It run on AWS or other "super-rich" environment. There, you can $$$ your way out of data corruption. You can even loss all the data if you have enough replicas and backups. Not many are in the game of Sqlite. This is the space I wish to work more: I think not only mean you can do better the high-end but is more practical all around: If you commit to a DB that depends of running in the cloud (to mask is not that fast, to mask is not that reliable, for extract more $$$ from customers, mostly) then when you NEED to have a portion of that data locally, you are screwed and then, you use sqlite! |
|
You can't buy your way out of having to deal with the fundamental problem of, "How do I provide the illusion of a single unified system for a highly distributed swarm of microservices?"
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_distributed_compu...