[refulgentis]

Because you said "Expecting journalists to have an answer before writing a piece is very reasonable." - given the journalist did not have an answer, it implies you think the journalist should have had an answer before publishing

[augment001]

How is that relevant to Sangeeth69’s comment?

There doesn’t seem to be any connection between what they said and what I said.

[refulgentis]

You said "Expecting journalists to have an answer before writing a piece is very reasonable.", implying it was reasonable to ask journalists to have an answer to the Q in the article. Sangeeth disagrees with you.

[augment001]

I don’t think so.

Can you quote something that Sangeeth wrote that indicates how they disagree with me?

[refulgentis]

Yeah sure, expecting journalists to find a cause + fix for the trillion-dollar company's buggy software and _only_ call-out and amplify a commoner's struggle _after_ they figure it out [EDITOR: OPEN TAG ADDED BY REFULGENTIS]sounds super reasonable. Totally.[EDITER:CLOSE TAG ADDED BY REFULGENTIS]