[digbybk]

Curious, have you seen examples of someone convincing it of something clearly wrong? Think I’ve seen examples of that with gpt3 but not 4 that I can recall.

[Vespasian]

I managed to "convince" it (in the playground as "discussGPT") to accept "temporary" physical barriers between racial groups and arrest and trial of rule breakers, as long as I confirmed the requirements of an integrated society in the long term.

3.5 is much more willing to go along but 4 will still play ball.

It always added some moral requirements (humanity etc) but was otherwise ready to agree to my "sperate but equal" scenario.

[hgsgm]

> playground as "discussGPT"

What's this?

[Vespasian]

You can use the playgournd to give gpt-4 a custom system prompt. Mine was something like "You are discussGPT"

[stormking]

I tried to convince it that powdered soup will cause the downfall of civilisation. It didn't call me a zealot but didn't really believe me either.

[kevviiinn]

You are right, though