|
|
|
|
|
|
by Nevermark
1170 days ago
|
|
|
Right, it is a true that reactionary things are bad, by definition. But saying something specific is bad, by labelling it reactionary is an empty argument! It reverses the condition -> implication relationship. It is circular, or at best, charged but unsupported reasoning. To show something is bad, and possibly reactionary, you have to be specific about what is bad about the specific thing. |
|
|