|
|
|
|
|
by ActorNightly
1166 days ago
|
|
There is even a simpler explanation. In order for AGI to even begin, it needs to self develop a method to improve itself. That means that the initial code that runs has to end up producing something that looks like an inference->error->training loop without any semblance of that being in the original code. No system in existence can do that, nor do we even have any idea of what that may even look like. The closest that we will get to AGI would be equivalent of a very smart human, who can still very much be controlled. |
|