[bena]

The issue isn't about the position itself, but who is claiming it. Or on whose behalf it is being claimed.

Musk pitched a $44 billion fit because Twitter wasn't "free speech enough" for a "free speech absolutist" like him. So he bought it and said he'd allow all legal speech on it.

All of these moves are directly counter to Musk's stated positions.

Furthermore, these moves are more capricious. You'll just never know what's not going to be allowed tomorrow. Or what decisions will be reversed the next day.

Before, who was making the moderation decisions at Twitter was opaque. But you knew their guidelines. Inciting an insurrection should be against Terms of Service in general.

Now, we know who is making the decisions, but we have no fucking clue as to why they're being made. Or, we know why. Because these entities have offended Musk in some way. But as to what will cause him offense on any given day, we have no idea.

[yucky]

So it's no different than it was before, so what's the problem?

[plokiju]

Hypocrisy