Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DoreenMichele 1167 days ago
While true, as a mother and environmental studies major, that wasn't the most important detail to me.

A. Human women become chimeras when they carry a fetus.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8155153

B. It's the reason for the headline -- their weird chimeric males -- but it seems more important to me that it facilitates invasive behavior by allowing a single ant to start a new colony.

YMMV, of course, and probably will.

2 comments

By that (fetomaternal) microchimerism standard all human children are chimeras when they are born. The features of (fetomaternal) microchimerism would be better defined in the temporal dimension as a temporary genotype addition with respect to the lifespan of an organism.
Don't lots of species store sperm? I see nothing too remarkable about a single individual being able to start a colony unless no species do store sperm.
There are other known ways of one individual being able to start a new population:

- The simplest and most obvious way to do this is to be a clonal organism.

- But you can go more complicated than that. You can have a female parthenogenetically give birth to males and then mate with those males. Aphids do this. (Actually, some cursory research suggests that aphids are more likely to give parthenogenetic birth to a batch of sons and daughters who then mate with each other?)

That species from other families do it does not make it less remarkable that these are the only ant species to do it.
I have asked around. It appears you are correct.