|
|
|
|
|
by rsynnott
1175 days ago
|
|
Most Christian denominations, and mainstream Islam, don't ascribe Him a gender. Catholicism is particularly explicit about this; see CCC 239: https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P17.HTM (the argument is substantially the same for most denominations). Things are a bit more complex in Judaism AIUI. Mormonism is the major exception, and considers God to be explicitly male. Now, that's the theology, of course; if you were to poll a few thousand Catholics or Anglicans or Muslims on whether God had a gender and what it is, they'd probably say yes He does and that He's a he. Though even then it'd get messy if you poll in more detail; virtually no followers of Abrahamic religion would think of God as having _physical_ male attributes, say. EDIT: I see you were downvoted for that. Wasn't me; it's a fair question IMO, and something that people are often unaware of. |
|
As for the male attributes, my guess would be that the majority of Christians would assume that God, being male, was equipped with an appropriately sized shlong, but did not avail Himself of it for any purpose.
To support that view, I submit that in Christian art, He generally is depicted with a sizable beard, and without functioning testicles, that beard would have to have been immaculately grown.