[gaius_baltar]

Isn't that basically Genetic Programming?

En passant, it's a bit sad that today's AI is almost 100% neural networks. I wonder how many evolutionary approaches are being tested behind closed doors by the metaphorical FAANGs.

[vharuck]

>Isn't that basically Genetic Programming?

Never heard of that, but looks very interesting. Thus the adage is reinforced for me, "If you think you're ignorant, just say what you know and wait for smarter people to correct you."

But, going by Wikipedia, genetic programming uses a predefined and controlled selection process. A self-editing computer virus would be "selected" by successfully spreading itself to more hosts. "Natural" selection style.

[Tommstein]

The overarching field is called evolutionary computation. But you don't have to choose either evolutionary computation or neural networks, they can be combined, look up stuff like NEAT and HyperNEAT where you evolve neural networks, both their topologies and weights.

[archon1410]

Aren't genetic/evolutionary algorithms also neural nets? The current big thing would be backpropagation/gradient descent, which are apparently superior to genetic algorithms for most relevant tasks.

[Tommstein]

> Aren't genetic/evolutionary algorithms also neural nets?

No (although note my comment above about stuff like NEAT and HyperNEAT, where you can use evolutionary computation to evolve neural networks).