[pantalaimon]

> @slaren made 7 commits in his fork, which @jart then squashed down into one

Good lord, it's terrible when the peanut gallery feels like they have to comment on development practice. Why would numbers of commits be a relevant metric in an Open Source project? Of course squashed commits are easier to handle during reabses and such, and when that work can be squashed to a single "initial mmap support" commit, then that's fine.

> @jart rewrote @slaren's code, which slaren wrote first

now this is just kindergarten level of arguments

[Zuiii]

Like it or not, they do offer a compelling argument though I personally don't care either way.

What I'd care more about is whether this issue had harmed the project in a technical way, which, unfortunately, it apparently has.