Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by keneda7 1163 days ago
Not the original poster but here is an article on SFs population

https://sfstandard.com/research-data/san-francisco-bay-area-... From 2020-2022 SF (city) -65,522 SF Bay Area -249,389

Its also worth noting the SF (city) decrease was -7.5% or number 1 amongst all US counties with more than 100k residents.

Pretty hard to argue there is no displacement happening when it leads the country.
1 comments
twblalock 1163 days ago
People leaving is not the same as displacement. Many people chose to leave during the pandemic for a variety of reasons, including tech workers moving away to work remotely.

After all, why stay in a city when everything is closed when you can get the same experience cheaper somewhere else?

Any time window that includes 2020 is going to include very strong pandemic-related effects.

link
keneda7 1163 days ago
>>After all, why stay in a city when everything is closed when you can get the same experience cheaper somewhere else?

If someone is moving due to cost that is displacement in my eyes. If there was not a cost, they would stay.

You claimed there was no evidence, I offered evidence now you say oh no that evidence doesn't count because it doesn't fit my narrative.

link
twblalock 1163 days ago
All you provided is evidence that people moved away from San Francisco during the pandemic. We all know that. Many of the people who left could have afforded to stay and chose not to. That is not displacement.

Proof of displacement requires demonstration that people left SF because they could not afford to live there anymore. It's really that simple.

Techies with six-figure incomes leaving town to move back in with their parents during the pandemic doesn't count as displacement.

link