|
|
|
|
|
by moonchrome
1176 days ago
|
|
But here's what happens when I try that : Me : I don't understand this publicly documented AWS service with plenty of OSS examples, can you suggest how I would solve some edge case X
GPT : Oh that's easy, invents bullshit that sounds exactly like what I need
Me : Googles the shit the GPT came up with and can't find any references
Me : Maybe there is something similar - spends more time searching
Me : GPT you're wrong - your solution doesn't exist
GPT : Oh sorry, here's the correct solution, comes up with more bulshit
Me : Googles the shit that GPT came up with and can't find any references
Me : Starts googling and solving the problem on my own
Me : Finds out X can't be done with AWS service
I've had this flow many times now, it never resulted in valuable output from GPT vs just Googling since I need to verify everything anyway.Or Me : Review and come up with improvements to this code : CP code
GPT : Suggest bullshit improvements, gives factually wrong reasoning, makes code worse
Me : Points out everything wrong
GPT : Suggest other bullshit improvements
Me : Points out everything wrong
GPT : Returns basically identical code to input
Or Me : Propose a design to this technical problem
GPT : Implements the solution in the most roundabout way and suboptimal way
IMO if I'm not sure what the output should be GPT is less than worthless it's actually convincingly misleading. |
|