|
|
|
|
|
by FusionX
1178 days ago
|
|
> For example, you identified an end point that should have a rate limit and didn't; you fixed it, it was a potential security issue That sounds careless. Any such change would need to have a impact analysis (which should be part of the team/org/company's SDLC). In this case, communication should be sent out to the clients of that endpoint, with a reasonable deadline, before enforcing any rate-limit. |
|
BOBFLANGLE IS DEPRECATED AND MAY BE REMOVED, PLEASE REDUCE THE BOBFLANGLE USAGE BELOW 1.5 MILLIBOBS
Then if it actually becomes an issue, you can pull logs from thousands/millions of systems, and determine the extent of actually removing the BOBFLANGLE and begin mitigation.