|
|
|
|
|
by masklinn
1179 days ago
|
|
> Lot of confusion here. UTC is a time standard, not a particular time zone. An instant written down in, say, the Pacific Standard Time Zone can be a UTC-scaled time. UTC is very much a timezone, that’s why it has a timezone designator (Z). If you record a future PST date as UTC and PST changes, your recorded date is now wrong. > So for a date to be “in UTC” really just means it uses the leap seconds published by IERS. This article says “integers in UTC” which is a little ambiguous, but probably means “integer UTC seconds since the Unix Epoch.” And that’s guaranteed to fuck up for future local events. |
|
Damn. That's a very good point. From now on, I'll be always recording also timezone, especially when it comes to future dates!