|
|
|
|
|
|
by dror
1168 days ago
|
|
|
Pretty much, except that I'm automating everything as much as I can, so that I just give the instructions and GPT does the rest. Here's an example: ----- #import ~/work/gish/tasks/coding.txt Change the following so that it looks for the open AI key in the following fashion: 1. env variable 2. os.home()/.openai 3. Throws an exception telling the user to put it in one of the above, and then exits #diff ~/work/gish/src/LLM.ts ----- Puts me in vimdiff comparing the old code with the generated code letting me review and cherry pick the changes. |
|
|
I haven't seen anyone else describing this workflow. Feed it the existing code, ask it to modify/improve/fix the code and output a new version of all the input code, review diffs.
It has downsides, because you can easily run out of context window of chatgpt-3.5-turbo. But I am getting much better code out of it versus other approaches I've tried. And it's a very efficient and natural workflow -- we're used to getting and reviewing diffs/PRs from human collaborators.