|
|
|
|
|
by ctroein89
1169 days ago
|
|
Sweden abolished inheritance taxes because the cost of enforcing the tax was greater than the taxes raised, and was passed by a left-wing coalition. At the time, it was considered a success of social democracy to not need inheritance taxes (and in fact, everyone, including the law, referred to dödsskatten - the death tax).
20 years isn’t ready enough time for wealth to consolidate like that via inheritance alone, and similar countries (like Norway and Germany) are seeing similarly rapid raises in their Gini Indexes for wealth, without chances to their inheritance tax systems. Something is broken in Western economies, but unfortunately, inheritance taxes in Sweden aren’t the problem. |
|
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/roiw.12294
Note that the study above only analyzed wealth in Sweden over the time period of 2007 (when the wealth tax was repealed, not 2005 as I erroneously wrote in my earlier comment) and 2012.
Germany and Norway don't share a comparable Wealth Gini (like I said above, it's WEALTH Gini, not Income Gini).
While absolute wealth inequality did grow in both NO and DE since 2008, SE's Wealth Concentration also at a much higher starting position than either NO and SE in 2008
DE 0.667 0.816NO 0.663 0.798
SE 0.742 0.867
2008 - https://www.nber.org/papers/w15508
2019 - https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/ab...
And finally, roughly the same old money families/nobility that existed in Sweden c. 1700 continue to have a roughly similar impact in Sweden c. 2012 from a social mobility standpoint.
https://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/papers/Swede...