[im3w1l]

It's quite simple. There are multiple conspiracies and they ally with each other but those bonds are fluid and shifting.

To give two examples relating to China and India here was a thread very recently that mentioned how the Mexican cartels are making inroads in the US, succesfully corrupting some police union and that cartel was also in cahoots with the chinese as thats where they were sourcing their fentanyl from.

There is also the Indian Brahmin conspiracy where they favor each other over other castes even abroad.

Both of these are real and established. But it's also clear that neither of them are all-powerful.

[tptacek]

Sounds pretty simple. Every abusive group in the world is coordinating with every other group.

[im3w1l]

I didn't word that very well, I meant that they sometimes ally, and sometimes oppose each other and often they are neutral.

[mthoms]

So their behaviour is entirely normal?

[im3w1l]

Well the point is that they are conspiracies, that is, groups of people scheming in secret how they can get more power at everyone else's expense.

[tptacek]

The less plausible the theory is, the more plausible it is!

[xist]

In those 2 examples, they have nothing to do with WEF's goal as far as I can tell.

In fact, Indian Brahmin would seem to contradict with WEF's supposed goals.

wrt Mexican cartels, I'm not sure how that fits into the original narrative of WEF - do Mexican cartels work for the WEF? I've never heard this theory before.

I don't see why any of the groups mentioned would submit themselves to endgoals WEF is supposedly aiming for. I'm skeptical why they would.