|
|
|
|
|
by graeme
1174 days ago
|
|
Counterpoint: the more our capacity grows, the more we have the legitimate ability to bring absolute destruction Plastic or some other chemical ending sperm counts —> we previously had no ability to affect the global ecosystem on this scale Bioweapon virus or microorganism eviscerating civilization —> we had no prior ability to engineer such a plague Nuclear holocaust —> we previously had no ability to destroy the world with weapons Runaway climate change —> we previously had no ability to alter the climate Ai sky net moment —> we previously had no ability to make such an intelligence Solar flare cutting all electronics —> we previously had no dependence upon a single point of failure I could go on. We’ve had plenty of civilizations collapse but nothing has been so linked before and we lacked such capacity before. This is not to say any of the above will come to pass. But it is foolish to say “apocalypses were previously impossible hence such warnings can be dismissed out of hand” |
|