|
|
|
|
|
|
by danielmarkbruce
1173 days ago
|
|
|
They will spit out crappy, copycat material which might be fake. Like 90% of the material created by humans. And then the people with something valuable to say will have something original and valuable. And we'll be back to having a search/curation/review problem on our hands. |
|
|
I learn from the 1% of material that is created by humans who are, to some degree, experts in their field.
Sometimes it's also wrong, but it's not because they were just lazily regurgitating rando 'net posts.