|
|
|
|
|
by sgtcodfish
1178 days ago
|
|
Having the communication in cleartext also makes it much easier for attackers to interfere with! Sure, they can't modify the .deb without failing signature verification, but they _can_ inject arbitrary delays in downloads or interfere with anything else which isn't signed (e.g. HTTP headers) Plus, if a vulnerability was discovered in the signing tool which enabled signature verification bypass with a certain signature format, HTTP makes it easy for attackers to perform that attack. TLS shouldn't be optional for installing packages today IMO - the extra guarantees it provides are worth it even with signature verification enabled. |
|