|
|
|
|
|
by iudqnolq
1173 days ago
|
|
> but that the way you're interacting with it is counterproductive if you want it to be useful to you like the person you first replied to rather than finding flaws in it I can't speak to the answer the person I replied to got, because they didn't post it. If they got the answer I got asking the same question the answer they got wouldn't have been useful to them. It's only counterproductive if I'm wrong. If I'm right that it's not yet useful for this sort of thing I'd only waste my time giving it more chances. > in this case, at least GPT4 gives reasonable options even though the travel times are messed up The reasonability of the options fundamentally depended on specific facts in this case. Mixing up a 3 hour train ride and a 12 hour train ride ruined the answer. So the answer I got from ChatGPT was fundamentally broken. |
|