[froh]

they need to protect themselves from the sickening legislation which is threatening medical practitioners with litigation.

religious worldviews drive a legislation to "eradicate transgenders".

the wpath requests a multimodal treatment team to support medical interventions with lasting effects, and the consent of caretakers / parents (unless it's harmful to the dependent adolescent) and age appropriate consent and no measures they are unfit to consent to.

all protection that's needed is in place.

what your attitude is doing is it's forcing gender dysphoric youths to go through the irreversible body changes induced by their puberty.

why? how does getting a beritone voice and a quarterback frame help a trans girl?

how do breasts and a small feminine silhouette help a trans man?

[dinkly]

No, they're protecting their members from being sued, as that video revealed.

The "trans child" is a medically and politically constructed entity, that has arisen from the rhetoric of activists. Children cannot meaningfully consent to these "gender affirming" medical interventions that will scar them for life, make them infertile and lose sexual function, and have an impact far beyond anything they can comprehend.

[froh]

I think you've made your point clear and I think you are not open to have your view changed.

I personally know trans people, living happy lives 20+ years into their transition, and all of them knew early on, and all of them had benefitted from and wished for much earlier access to gender affirming healthcare and back in the days early access simply did not exist, because of the FUD and pseudo protective position you propagate.

my thoughts and prayers go out to you.