Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by The5thElephant 1174 days ago
Of course it's just class names, what I mean is that if fewer people used React and more used Svelte/Vue they would feel less need for things like Tailwind or CSS-in-JS.

My argument is that React is actively bad for writing HTML/CSS, and therefore people came up with clunky solutions to get around those limitations. Certainly Tailwind is more than just a solution for React, but a large part of its popularity is due to it.
1 comments
illiarian 1174 days ago
> they would feel less need for things like Tailwind or CSS-in-JS.

Why do people keep mentioning Tailwind and CSS-in-JS in the same sentence?

And no, Tailwind would still have its place even if Svelte appeared first because instead of writing the same styles everywhere you'd still want to extract them into a file, and have sensible defaults for them.

Oh look, Tailwind does exactly that.

link
The5thElephant 1174 days ago
> Why do people keep mentioning Tailwind and CSS-in-JS in the same sentence?

Because one of the biggest arguments for each is scoping styles to a component instead of the default global cascade.

> And no, Tailwind would still have its place even if Svelte appeared first because instead of writing the same styles everywhere you'd still want to extract them into a file, and have sensible defaults for them.

Writing same styles everywhere? I'm not sure I understand what you mean, that isn't related to Tailwind or frameworks. Sensible defaults are just design system tokens, those are usable in way more styling approaches than just Tailwind.

I'm not saying Tailwind wouldn't exist, I'm saying it wouldn't be as wildly popular as it is now. React's lack of CSS features has encouraged a generation of frontend devs to simply not learn CSS fully. Sure you need to know some CSS to use Tailwind, but in many cases people just copy-paste Tailwind templates from elsewhere (another benefit of Tailwind) and don't actually understand the styling. I see Tailwind classes that do nothing in the wild all the time.

link
illiarian 1174 days ago
> Because one of the biggest arguments for each is scoping styles to a component instead of the default global cascade.

Escaping the global cascade has been on everyone's mind since forever. BEM, one of the lost popular ways to try and scope CSS to components, was invented in 2006: https://en.bem.info/methodology/history/

OOCSS is 2009: https://www.slideshare.net/stubbornella/object-oriented-css

> Writing same styles everywhere? I'm not sure I understand what you mean,

You need to specify things like font sizes, line heights, border styles, colors etc.

> React's lack of CSS features has encouraged a generation of frontend devs to simply not learn CSS fully.

This has nothing to do with React. No one ever learned CSS fully. If anything, Tailwind encourages you to learn more CSS.

> but in many cases people just copy-paste Tailwind templates from elsewhere (another benefit of Tailwind) and don't actually understand the styling.

How different is it from all the history of the web?

link