[glass3]

>Hopefully Binance still has all the money

How can they? SVB has made it clear that it is very difficult to maintain value. If Binance has invested all their money in securities, it's not unlikely that their investments have gone done down with the rising of the interest rates.

If they keep all money in regular banking accounts, they may still have it. But they are exposed to the risk that their bank or their banks become insolvent.

[trompetenaccoun]

I have doubts about their finances but that comparison makes no sense. SVB is a bank, Binance is a cryptocurrency exchange that doesn't have the fiat custody issue to that extend because they're mainly not dealing in fiat. It's more of a question of how companies like Tether have invested their dollars and the answer is nobody really knows.

[glass3]

Tether has the same problem. What happens to Binance's Tether coins if Tether's bank collapses?

[trompetenaccoun]

They claim most of their money is not with banks (number 1 is supposedly commercial paper). Also what is with banks certainly isn't with American ones. But this goes back to the point earlier about users having no idea about the reserves. No one should use Tether and I don't trust Binance for a second, pretty sure they trade against their own users. But it's also more resilient than many think, including people who are in crypto. Binance isn't well trusted by insiders and whales. But they have a lot of customers, especially in developing countries less served by more reputable exchanges and banks. And since they offer USDT, USDC as well as their own stablecoin, whatever that's backed by, it would not be catastrophic for them even if one of the stablecoin issuers went down.

[ceejayoz]

> number 1 is supposedly commercial paper

They claim to have divested of it all, without any losses, during a significant downturn.

[trompetenaccoun]

They claimed that before the banking crisis, after there was considerable pressure on them to disclose where the reserves are kept (many in crypto doubted if all the money even exists). At the time it didn't look good because what everyone wanted to hear was that they keep it as cash in a bank, so the commercial paper disclosure was seen as negative and risky. Ironically it turns out that this might actually be safer than what USDC did. They played by the book and wanted to prove full solvency by having every single dollar in bank custody. Which nearly cost them their neck with the SVB failure when parts of the funds got frozen and users panicked.