|
|
|
|
|
by Psychlist
1173 days ago
|
|
The trouble with the very first render is that the author is wrong about why the bike wouldn't work. The head tube isn't braced well enough to allow the front brake to be used, and would twist when cornering to a degree that would unsettle most riders. The missing chainstay would only be an issue for powerful cyclists or people standing up to pedal. But the bicycle shown could definitely be built and ridden. Probably more practical than Saul Griffith's plexiglass bicycle (that was also built and ridden). At one stage Klein had a problem with the chainstays separating at the bottom bracket and a number of people rode those bikes after breaking them... almost exactly the "missing chainstay" problem above. I've built some very weird bicycles and broken both those and conventional bicycles. I have at least some idea of what works... I'd be willing to build as many of those renders as someone was willing to pay for. |
|
Aren't you assuming that it's a tube of the same thickness as a typical bike?
And furthermore, that someone building it wouldn't be allowed to make obvious accomodations to reinforce the parts of the frame under stress?
E.g. [1] shows a bike for sale with similarly lacking bracing of the head tube.
1. https://cowboy.com/products/e-bike-cowboy-4?variant=41191037...