[selcuka]

> it was long waterfall chains of terrible javascript loaders

> Well, not end users. They're getting ads.

Why not? Would you prefer ads, or ads with terrible javascript loaders?

[HWR_14]

I would prefer ads with terrible javascript loaders, as they are easier to more completely and reliably block.

[selcuka]

The ads still use javascript; they are just not as "terrible" (a.k.a. waterfall).

[HWR_14]

The waterfall ones were easier to detect and block, IIRC.