|
|
|
|
|
by dalyons
1175 days ago
|
|
Why? What is anyone gaining by forcing individuals and businesses to utilize middlemen to split their cash across dozens of bank accounts? Just guarantee deposits for all and skip the performative complicated BS. Spread 250ks all comes out of the same fdic pool anyway, so why bother? |
|
I think the government should reserve the right to haircut large depositors in cases where there is serious negligence or malfeasance, so it makes sense to have the limit. But it's also a good idea not to do that in cases of mere incompetence, like here.
The alternative is to do like Canada and basically keep around a handful of big banks and make it illegal for them to acquire each other (to avoid further concentration). We don't have to rescue them basically ever... but if we did it would be abysmally expensive. And customer service is garbage.