[schiffern]

>Product's construction complexity is irrelevant and always was.

From the post you replied to:

"What is overlooked in the debate today is that BEV cars will be much cheaper than ICE cars in the long run."

It's relevant because it relates to cost, which is your very first bullet point.

In the USA we're already moving toward mandating a simple credit card tap/swipe for payment. This should be done globally.

Your other issues are solved by adding more charging points, which we need anyway. If you have L2 chargers at your curbside/work/grocery store/movie theater/etc (where your car is parked anyway), the less you need to rely on costly and time-consuming L3 charging.

[TheLoafOfBread]

> It's relevant because it relates to cost, which is your very first bullet point.

This would hold water only if BEVs would be actually cheaper, they are more expensive than complex ICEs. So your whole thesis goes out of the window.

[schiffern]

>> BEV cars will be much cheaper

> they are more expensive

Present tense vs. future tense. Please read more closely!

The (Wright's Law) trend of EV cost is quite clearly dropping below ICE vehicles. At their recent investor day, Tesla unveiled the first plausible engineering pathway to a $25k vehicle, ie equivalent to a $17k ICE car.

It's no great secret that currently the biggest problem with EVs is upfront cost. That's why the serious players are focused on precisely this problem.