|
|
|
|
|
by bgruber
5249 days ago
|
|
I said "not always". You said "typically (not always)" and I say pretty close to never. I don't try to justify the tiering of the co-pay You said the co-pay was tiered "because such procedures are typically (not always) preventable" (emphasis mine). (i'm note 100% sure that by 'tiered' you mean that you pay 50% for this instead of the flat or 0 co-pay most dental coverage has for checkups and the like) |
|
If I were trying to explain the rationale in this case, I'd theorize it's because this is typically something that happens once in a lifetime (if at all). I'd expect once one wisdom tooth gets cranky, they'd yank the rest at the same time. So, in this case, the thought would be that people partially pay for it when it happens rather than making everyone in the insurance pool pay for that risk every month, especially people with no wisdom teeth.
But I am not an actuary or insurer, so I don't know for sure.