| > What is shady/illegal about this? In of itself? Nothing. In combination with all other factors. Everything. > Just because a DMCA takedown request was filed against user B's link doesn't mean user A should lose their legitimately owned file. As a copyright holder, that's not my problem that 1 in a million decided to upload some questionable copy of my work to a publicly accessible pseudo-sharing site that violates my copyright over and over and over again. If you upload it to MU, then cry to someone else when that same criminal enterprise gets shut down and you lose the one copy you had. Your right weren’t violated. Mine were. Anyone crying about this is just playing a victim card here after making a bad decision. Or can't come to grips with reality after assuming that since copyright infringement is so easy to do, it must not be a bad thing to do, and it must be part of your entitlement. |
I know of someone who may or may not have used a site like UU to get recent episodes of the show X. Once UU stopped sharing links, this person looked for other ways to get the recent episodes of X. She tried purchasing them from iTunes, but to no avail; She tried purchasing from Amazon Streaming but to no avail. Her only option is to wait for the DVD to come out or pirate.
There is a case where money is lost due to piracy. The answer is not to sue the pirates but to provide distribution methods.