|
|
|
|
|
by powertower
5254 days ago
|
|
All my premises have been that 1) MU was one of the top piracy sites on the net, 2) profited from piracy, and 3) was designed for spreading piracy. Instead of edge-cases, how about a common one? Or does that not count? So yes, if any of the above is true, what happened to MU was good. And as far as that loaded question about the person losing his child's sports matches... You can frame it however you want, it does not change the facts we know about MU. MU was most likely a criminal enterprise. |
|
You can call that "loaded" if you like, but it actually happened.