|
|
|
|
|
|
by powertower
5254 days ago
|
|
|
> If a file resides on a server, but has no access to the outside world, does the file still exist? When there are 100 more links to it? Yes. It exists. > So, there is a huge question as to what probable cause the feds had to search MU's mail server in the first place, given that MU was complying with the DMCA safe harbor provision. The rest of your post is one assumption after the other, that goes against what is reasonable to assume based on everything we've witnessed in this case. |
|
|
There is no question in my mind that MU thrived by appearing to comply with the DMCA, while encouraging illegal use of its service.
However, if the gov't wanted to really send these guys to jail for a long time, they appear to have screwed up the foundation of their case pretty well. If the initial search of the MU mail server was not found to be valid, the feds lose. If Cogent & Carpathia delete all of MU's data (i.e. evidence) and the feds can't prove in court that offending material existed, the feds lose. It's turned into a real mess from a prosecution standpoint. No wonder Kim pleaded not guilty instead of taking a plea bargain.