What do you mean by the question? Non-agile people? You mean people that don’t do scrum? Or do you want someone to step forward and say: “I’m really rigid and refuse to change direction once I start, this is how I get things done…”
If you mean no scrum, simple, no card wall, tasks are epics, trust people to know what to do and let them do it. Help people when needed.
The problem I have with your question is "agile" seems to mean anything except a pure waterfall development model.
Even modified waterfall seems to be described as agile.
As a sole developer of a software product, I haven't figured out how the agile principles even apply to me.
"Individuals and interactions over processes and tools" doesn't work when there's only one person.
"Working software over comprehensive documentation" Does that mean ship code but don't provide comprehensive documentation to my users? No, it means internal process documentation. Which isn't applicable since it's just me.
"Customer collaboration over contract negotiation". That only applies for contract software development. I sell a software product.
"Responding to change over following a plan". I don't have much of a plan, so I guess I do this one. But I do have a long-term vision, since that's essential to figuring out what groundwork to have.
Personally, I learned RAD (rapid application development) when I was a young programmer back in the 1990s, and that's what I still use.
I was using the term to find common ground. I don’t call them epics, just they are a big thing.
Scrum reminds me of the old adage about measuring a beach, you can measure it by sight, or by using a yardstick, or by counting grains of sand in a row. Scrum sits too close to counting sand, I prefer to be at the yardstick level.
There is an idiocy to scrum that involves/wastes the whole team on simple planning tasks that could be more effectively done by a single person. This is compounded with practices like mobbing… It removes craft from software and just makes it lowest common denominator.
Agile manifesto is still great and relevant. But that’s not what people mean when they say Agile
My team of 7 (inc manager and pm) does 2 stand-ups a week (doing it in slack is okay if needed), and never sprint planning or any other recurring meetings. Any other planning or meetings is done as hoc as needed. We usually have ~3 projects going on in parallel so not many cooks in kitchen and not a lot of syncing required. We use jira for tickets and have a “sprint board”, but it’s super casual just a place to track stuff and I roll the sprint once a month without any meeting or ceremony.
Probably similar to you but without "sprints" or "stand-ups" or reporting to "product owners", "agile coaches" or "business analysts". You would work on "epics", or projects as you would call them more dignifiedly.
If you mean no scrum, simple, no card wall, tasks are epics, trust people to know what to do and let them do it. Help people when needed.