[Melingo]

It is because it's not about the military in this thread and you try to justify the energy usage of Bitcoin with the us military.

And I already agree that the energy consumption of the us military should also be checked and reduced.

[lowkey]

If the goal is to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels and toward a clean energy future based on renewable energy, then Bitcoin mining helps us get there faster.

This is due to its unique property to act as a buyer of last resort for stranded or intermittent energy supplies. Bitcoin subsidizes green energy. Ban Bitcoin mining and we get less renewable energy capacity built.

Why should Bitcoin mining be banned?

[Melingo]

You remember the gas power plant in new York city which was offline and than got bought because of Bitcoin?

Pls walk me through a real example were Bitcoin makes more renewable energy net positive.

Because Bitcoin will consume ALL available energy.

[lowkey]

Fair point, but a single anecdote doesn’t equal the general case.

Texas is home to more Bitcoin miners than any other state. Up thread, I shared a detailed example from the Guardian explaining how the power purchase agreements between miners and energy utilities encourages investment in wind and solar build out to strengthen the Texas grid.

As someone who personally worked on the financial plan to build at the time the largest wind farm in Canada, I can say with confidence that wind and solar builds live and die on having enough long-term power purchase agreements to justify their financing.

From the article:

“If you were a miner that has a long-term power purchase agreement, then you own power at a fixed price … you’re committing to buying energy for years no matter what,” Les said.

As a bitcoin miner, you essentially own that power, and that allows you to work like a virtual power plant. You can take the power that you agreed to buy at a fixed lower price, and then you can sell that back to the grid.”

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/aug/17/bitcoin-c...