Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by AviationAtom 1181 days ago
This is so comical because it's so relevant.

Do you think people architect poorly designed systems more often than not as a means of job security or just a failure to put much forethought in whilst planning it?

3 comments

I’d more bet on “Warning for years that this is a point of failure but management wants to chase $shiny instead”
I guess copilot can't write monitoring rules.
> I’d more bet on “Warning for years that this is a point of failure but management wants to chase $shiny instead”

I'd almost guarantee you're right on the money with that line of thinking…

Or maybe just laziness.

I know someone who joined a company and found a dead-man's switch in the server.

He could have taken it out, but instead he just resets it every three months, just like the guy before him.

If the company ever gets rid of him and doesn't hire someone equally skilled and thorough, the production server will eat itself right about the time his unemployment benefits run out.

Failure of forethought with the wrong deadlines in place, soup to nuts.