|
|
|
|
|
|
by osigurdson
1183 days ago
|
|
|
>> ~500us (that is microseconds). 500us is slow. This kind of performance does not remotely obsolete an LRU cache (main memory access is ~5000X faster). 500us is essentially intra-datacenter latency. Obviously your data is in memory on the B-Tree server as there is no room in this budget for disk IO. Postgres will perform just as well if data is in memory hitting a hash index (even B-Tree probably). I don't think the B-Tree key-value store you mention is adding much. Use Redis or even just Postgres. |
|
|