Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by awill 1178 days ago
You're absolutely right. It's absurd to frame it this way.

Do they expect people to think "Wow, Github leaked a key, but even without knowing if anyone snagged it, they're still replacing it. Wow, they go above and beyond."

It's so ridiculous.

2 comments

Not playing devil’s advocate but guess they at least have some confidence that no one checked out/pulled the repo while the key was there?

After all it’s them hosting and serving the requests for that (and every other) repo.

There is a literal stream of all public data on GitHub. I don't think they can 100% know if it was accessed or not.
"We have no reason to believe" => We don't actually know
Charitable explanation is that they rotated they key without waiting for an analysis.
To be fair, there are somehow people in this post who seem to be arguing that GH should not rotate the key.