So why not let people decide for themselves whether they want to be remote? You're assuming in person workers are more effective, which is precisely what's in question to begin with.
How is my assumption different from the pro-remote work people who assume remote workers are more effective.
Both sides here think they’re correct and are incredibly dogmatic and protective of their side.
Companies can choose to let workers decide. It’s definitely one of the options available. But companies can also mandate RTO or mandate continued remote work.
All of those choices allow the employee to decide if the company’s choice is a dealbreaker for them when it comes to where they choose to work.
Another issue is that the pro-remote workers love to assume that a pro-office person sitting alone in the office while everyone else works remotely makes everyone happy. This isn’t always the case.
Both sides here think they’re correct and are incredibly dogmatic and protective of their side.
Companies can choose to let workers decide. It’s definitely one of the options available. But companies can also mandate RTO or mandate continued remote work.
All of those choices allow the employee to decide if the company’s choice is a dealbreaker for them when it comes to where they choose to work.
Another issue is that the pro-remote workers love to assume that a pro-office person sitting alone in the office while everyone else works remotely makes everyone happy. This isn’t always the case.