Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by quickthrower2 1182 days ago
With stable coins you can have insolvency which is worse than a bank run probably (because no government insurance). Stable coins are the worse to keep cash - higher risk than a bank account but no interest. The only logical uses for them is online gambling and money laundering.

You don’t own a USDC. Instead some random offshore company owes you a dollar.

1 comments

How can a stable coin be insolvent if they have proof of reserves showing they have assets that match total deposit value?
Same way you did with svb. A stable coin is basically a bank. They take in assets and generate tokens against them. If there is a mass withdrawal they would need to sell assets possibly at a loss to cover it. If they a duration mismatch then they eat the losses come withdrawal time. Go too fast and they depeg and boom
1. Do they post daily proof of reserves?

2. Are their bank accounts locked down to strictly the blockchain activity?

Proof of reserves means everyone was safe yesterday, at best.