Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nycdatasci 1190 days ago
Can we agree that an "early (yet still incomplete) version of AGI" isn't AGI?
2 comments
ftxbro 1190 days ago
To me it's clear that they think it's AGI, and that they think AGI is such a loaded concept that it's not worth "announcing" it.

Beliefs are changing so fast right now. The term "AGI skeptic" will soon (if not already) mean "I don't trust AGIs in positions of authority or power" rather than "I don't think the technology is capable of matching our level of cognition."

link
famouswaffles 1190 days ago
If you think AGI is artificial, and generally intelligent then yeah it's AGI 100% but some people have such loaded expectations of AGI that a significant chunk of the human population wouldn't even pass lol.
link
dragonwriter 1190 days ago
I hope we can agree that “not completely X” is “not X”.
link
coldtea 1189 days ago
Why would we agree on that? Anything "not completely X" surely the attribute of aproaching Xness, else it would just be "not X".
link
pixl97 1188 days ago
So if you get your finger cut off, or you go blind, you're not human any more?
link