|
|
|
|
|
|
by taftster
1184 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, agreed. But not in a clean "fluent" style. There's something nice about the fluent style that appeals to me (at least). And I don't like having to provide one constructor for every optional (default) value, when its omitted. There's just not as nice of a style. The "telescoping" constructor pattern is just really hard to use, read and maintain. |
|
|