[tannhauser23]

Whenever I see a politician or regulator arrested for accepting bribes, I think, what an amateur. American elites have perfected the art of the grift: do a turn in government or academy, and then become a ‘thought leader’ or form an NGO and collect speaking fees from Wall Street and foreign powers. Wait for your party to get back in power, do another round in government, rinse and repeat. Even the Presidency and Prime Ministership are just a stage in one’s path towards hedge fund riches.

[boeingUH60]

You don't even have to wait after leaving office...you can just get a multi-million dollar book deal payout while in office.

[aikinai]

In Japan they have a wired for it, “amakudari” (descending from Heaven). I think it helps people understand the concept and the prevalence to have a dedicated word and not have to describe it.

[starkd]

The turning point was the Clinton administration. Before that, no former president would dare sully the office by accepting honorarium or speaking fees. At least, not nearly on the scale Clinton took it to.

[vlovich123]

Naw. Carter was the last one. Reagan was taking large speaking fees. The Bushes may have avoided doing so too much but they’re “old money”.

[taylodl]

What do you propose? Every party involved has the freedom to associate with whomever they want and the right to conduct business with them. If Yellen was doing a lousy job then presumably far fewer people would be willing to pay her a speaker fee. But hey, if people want to pay her to speak then that's their business.

[dtech]

The problem is it just means money == political power, which purportedly democracies try to not have.

[taylodl]

The Fed isn't the government and Yellen isn't a politician. Those statements aren't technicalities, they are facts. The Fed was vested by Congress to be the U.S.' banker due to Congress' abysmal history of failure managing money policy.

As far as money == political power, start with campaign finance reform. That's the vehicle being used to "buy" politicians.