|
|
|
|
|
by hnlmorg
1190 days ago
|
|
> But a couple of years is a huge amount of time. If you put in just 4 hours a week you'll be done in no time. Sure, if you put 4 hours a week into any activity you’ll soon get good at it. But the crux of the issue is whether that activity is seen as a priority or not. > Not knowing how to drive in that situation is because of not caring very much, not because of moving around. They didn’t care because they were moving around a lot. And frankly it doesn’t really matter what the reason is. Regardless of whether it is a practical or preferential justification, the end result is the same: plenty of people manage just fine without learning to drive. I find it weird that this concept is so alien to some people. But I guess that’s a good example of the diversity of the readership on here. |
|
This doesn't seem to be about travel at all. It's just that some people don't get a license.
It's not that the concept is alien, it's that the justification you gave isn't really true. It doesn't make it a "whole lot harder to learn to drive". Moving around has almost no effect on getting some driving lessons.