[shubhamjain]

Although impressive, many of the photos shown can't be passed off as authentic headshots. Many of the photos linked in the landing page itself have issues. Example [1].

But even if I ignore them most of them, there is something off. Maybe I am biased because I know it's AI-generated, but I also feel they look too polished for the real world. The facial skin isn't generally this perfect. And the bokeh looks like it has been artificially added.

I won't say I can point out 100% of the time when a photo has been AI generated. But if I saw a series of them generated with the same software, I don't think it will be too hard.

[1]: https://bit.ly/4033epk

[Gigachad]

They all have skin that’s too perfect. The images are high resolution and hyper detail but then the skin looks like it was airbrushed on

[Mizoguchi]

I would say >95% of digital portrait photographers retouch and soften their subjects facial features. If they don't do that customers would not be very pleased with the results. So it is a pretty common, accepted and even encouraged practice in portrait photography, particularly in product, wedding and corporate shots.

[forgotusername6]

The hands are a dead giveaway that it is AI as opposed to being simply photoshopped.

[Phelinofist]

Can't unsee now: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrcQsBIaEAAYMmb.jpg

[masfuerte]

I'm looking forward to a future in which people have plastic surgery to get "AI hands".

[makapuf]

Damn, just as I got those nice jpeg artifacts surgery ...

[layer8]

That hair also seems to want to be part of the jacket.

[KineticLensman]

hands and fingers are frequently off in the landing page shots, although the example you've highlighted is particularly bad. I found a couple where the fingers are correctly formed but the proportions are wrong, e.g. [0]

[0] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmSSw-maAAAaZ0g.jpg