Hilarious that you asked a question and then immediately changed that to a statement 20 minutes later when challenged. Why didn’t you just make it a statement to begin with?
The point your rhetorical question tries to drive home is bad which is why other commenters didn't let it sit. Thanks to dang hacker news has rules of conduct that prevent this place from degenerating into a cesspool, but now that another company applied similar rules to its AI then the free speech absolutists decry at the podium.
If you want a generative AI without any decency then make it yourself, but don't act like this AI is censored just because it communicates in the way that everyone in society does when they are not protected by the veil of online anonymity
Rhetorical questions don’t work the way you think they do then. Asking a question whose answer is controversial and which is phrased as an innocent inquiry is not rhetorical. At best it’s a tired ingroup membership signal rather than a honest attempt at discourse.